Philip Cooke says with swingeing cuts in government budgets likely this year, the UK must learn from the US destination marketing and business tourism’s buying and funding experience.
They say that those who live by the sword die by the sword; and as far as UK tourism is concerned, those who have lived by government funding are now staring into the abyss. Few public-funded agencies will be able to withstand the consequences of the UK recession and the government's £824bn debt mountain.
Tourism agency, VisitBritain, is trying to both capitalise on and prepare for the 2012 London Olympics against a background of a 20 per cent budget cut.
Those who work for the government will make the best of things; those in government will try to justify their actions; and those in opposition and the media will condemn the government for its lack of foresight and industry support.
In the USA, tourism, or 'destination marketing', is less reliant on federal funding, it is largely dependent on local government allocations, and the public and private sectors have come together to fight for the importance of the highly-lucrative conference and meetings sector.
Tourism professionals in the States have always worked much more closely with the private sector and traditionally enjoyed income produced by a range of local taxes, such as the hotel bed tax and the restaurant sales tax.
Scottsdale in Arizona last year experienced a 30 per cent slump in tourism-related business, so the city council is considering a two per cent increase in the local bed tax, which could raise an additional $5.5m per annum to boost the city's tourism development programme.
This locally determined action could never happen in the UK where 'hypothecated', or earmarked, taxation is virtually unheard of and where government revenues are highly centralised and controlled.
Most tourism organisations in America are members of the Destination Marketing Association International (DMAI) which recently joined forces with the US Travel Association to establish a fundraising foundation. A campaign war-chest of $4m was raised, now being used to finance a nationwide programme of economic impact modelling, political advocacy and a campaign against the 'negative rhetoric' directed at the industry, after business tourism found itself victimised as both a symptom of, and a scapegoat for, corporate excess.
Barnett to open new innings at EIBTM
Meetings manifesto for Britain
Are you in the Meetings Mindset?
Jersey gets new wind in its meeting sails
Seeing the light
Rule, Britannia!